Forum

Sony A7r II Vs Sony...
 
Notifications
Clear all
Sony A7r II Vs Sony A7s II: Which Is Better?
Sony A7r II Vs Sony A7s II: Which Is Better?
Group: Registered
Joined: 2021-12-31
New Member

About Me

Having said that, hybrid photographers will find a lot to like in the a7R II, with to its high-quality Super35 video recording, S-Log mode, and other useful features. This Sony a7S II vs Sony a7R II comparison is just what you've been looking for if you're having trouble deciding between these two cameras. You may use downsampling to lessen the sense of noise while maintaining a high resolution at the same time. Some further customization, such as the option to start movie recording with the shutter button while in movie mode, would be appreciated.  
Jaymes Dempsey is a skilled macro and wildlife photographer from in the Midwest region of the United States. Many of the world's best photographic sites have featured his in-depth observations on photography and gear, and he continues to contribute to them. Performance of the autofocus system isn't very impressive, but it isn't awful either, and you'll like the smaller size when compared to DSLR competition. The Sony a7S II is an excellent choice for video-centric photographers, since it allows you to record high-quality film even in low light conditions.  
I'm perplexed as to why Sony did not use a multi-angle monitor on the A7s II, given that the latter is primarily intended for video production. Touch sensitivity is not available on the displays, which may be a good inclusion in the future. I have to confess that my first thoughts of the A7s have somewhat shifted with the introduction of the current generation of mark II models. The A7r mark II's low-light skills are still superb, but after using it for more than a year, I'm beginning to question if the additional performance of the A7s II at high ISOs is actually essential. 69 distinct specifications, the current market price, and DxO Mark ratings are used in our Decision Algorithm to dynamically rate cameras, allowing for a more objective and consistent comparison.  
The a7S II is Sony's premier video/stills hybrid camera, providing great capabilities for dedicated video shooters while also satisfying the demands of a wide range of still photographers. Assuming that you find yourself in low-light conditions on a regular basis, the A7s II may be a better choice if you know you will be using it between ISO 6400 and ISO 12800 on a regular basis. If you currently work with Sony cameras, it may also serve as an ideal second body for taking still photographs in low light. In addition, a cable protector for the microphone and headphone ports is included in the package, which is essential when shooting video with external equipment attached to the camera while shooting video.  
  
Furthermore, all of those pixels result in photos that are somewhat larger than 67x44cm when printed at 300ppi. Images taken with the A7S II, on the other hand, measure slightly under 36x24cm at 300ppi. While this seems to be a little improvement over the A7R II's capabilities, it is more than sufficient for the majority of wedding photographers, and the A7S II's low-light prowess makes it a suitable option for shooting in poorly lit churches. The shutter speed information provided pertains to the usage of a mechanical shutter and is not accurate.  
When it comes to continuous autofocus, the A7r II has a distinct edge since it switches to phase detection, which eliminates the need for the bothersome back and forth movement of the camera lens. When you conduct the basic test shown below, you can observe how the A7r II was able to follow Heather's movements more precisely than before. Another benefit of the A7r II is its burst speed of 5 frames per second with focus priority, which is faster than the competition. When shooting in low light, the A7r II focuses more quickly if you leave it in Continuous Autofocus (C-AF).  
When it comes to storing image data, both the A7R II and the A7S II write their files to SDXC or Memory Stick PRO Duo cards, depending on the model. Both cameras are compatible with UHS-I cards, which allow for ultra-fast data transmission rates of up to 104 MB/s when using the cards. It is possible to charge the battery packs of both cameras using a USB cable, which may be quite useful while traveling. For dedicated video shooters, the a7S II is almost certainly the superior choice, however you'll have to decide if the additional $1000 USD is worth it to you before making the purchase decision.  
The Sony A7S II is equipped with a 12.0MP Full frame (35.6 x 23.8 mm) CMOS sensor with a Bionz X processor, which is a first for Sony. The Sony A7R II, on the other hand, sports a 42.0MP Full frame (35.9 x 24 mm) BSI-CMOS sensor and is equipped with a Bionz X image processing engine. Although the Sony a7R II does not produce particularly impressive results in full frame mode, the camera does provide results that are close to the quality of the original a7S and that are very similar to the picture of the Sony a7S II. The so-called "rolling shutter" effect is a phenomena that causes a camera picture to be skewed when rapidly moving objects are captured, as well as when pans and handled camera movement are performed quickly.  
Despite the fact that the A7S II was somewhat less expensive than the A7R II at launch, both cameras are in the same price range. Typically, street prices stay similar to the MSRP for the first few months, but after a few months, the first reductions begin to surface. Further discounting and stock clearing discounts are commonplace later in the product cycle, and particularly when the successor model is ready to be introduced. As a result, the camera price is often reduced by a significant amount. Within the following table are included the primary physical features of the two cameras as well as a more comprehensive list of alternatives. Alternatively, if you want to change the focus of the display and look at a different camera pair, you may go over to the CAM-parator tool and pick from the large number of alternative camera comparisons that are available there.  
What I can usually notice is that the a7S II has superior noise performance than its predecessor. As a result, even with a little amount of noise, the a7R II looks good up to ISO 12,800 and is capable of resolving features in the shadow regions. Nonetheless, in 4K full-frame mode, where the image is significantly weaker, the a7R II boasts around 50% better rolling shutter performance than its predecessor. Set your Sony a7S II to Slog3Cine in order to get a dynamic range that is similar to that of the a7R II. However, since the camera is restricted to 8-bit color, Slog3 is not the best gamma mode to use because it causes banding difficulties. Instead, Slog2 is the optimum gamma mode to use.  

Location

Occupation

printed
Social Networks
Member Activity
0
Forum Posts
0
Topics
0
Questions
0
Answers
0
Question Comments
0
Liked
0
Received Likes
0/10
Rating
0
Blog Posts
0
Blog Comments
Share:
Translate »